<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>NewsTalk 1290 News &#38; Talk of Texoma &#187; celebrity news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newstalk1290.com/tags/celebrity-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newstalk1290.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Celebs Need Worry About New Photoshop Rating System</title>
		<link>http://newstalk1290.com/celebs-ratings-system-photoshop/</link>
		<comments>http://newstalk1290.com/celebs-ratings-system-photoshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shauna Wright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=62838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These days, it&#8217;s almost unheard of to see a celebrity photo that hasn&#8217;t been airbrushed or otherwise digitally manipulated to make the person in the picture look nearly flawless. While they may make pretty magazine covers, two researchers are proposing a ratings system to let people know exactly how much a photo has been manipulated. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, it&#8217;s almost unheard of to see a celebrity photo that hasn&#8217;t been airbrushed or otherwise digitally manipulated to make the person in the picture look nearly flawless. While they may make pretty magazine covers, two researchers are proposing a <a href="http://www.livescience.com/17206-digital-photos-celebrity-retouched.html" >ratings system</a> to let people know exactly how much a photo has been manipulated.</p>
<p>
<p class="more_act text"><a href="http://newstalk1290.com/celebs-ratings-system-photoshop/" title="Celebs Need Worry About New Photoshop Rating System">Read More</a><em>|</em><a href="http://newstalk1290.com/celebs-ratings-system-photoshop/#comments_wrap" title="Celebs Need Worry About New Photoshop Rating System">Comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newstalk1290.com/celebs-ratings-system-photoshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/newstalk1290.com/files/2011/11/photoshop-before-after.jpg" height="480" width="640" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">torimbc, Flickr</media:description>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 707/740 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/newstalk1290.com

Served from: newstalk1290.com @ 2013-05-24 06:30:43 -->